By D. K. Fieldhouse
Read Online or Download Colonialism 1870–1945: An Introduction PDF
Similar specific topics books
Baker e. D. (ed. ) Brainwashing (Foundation of Human figuring out, 1991)(ISBN 0933900163)
“A publication that are supposed to be learn by means of someone who offers a rattling a couple of non-racist, non-sexist, non-homophobic destiny. ” [Bo Brown]. “The transformation to a neo-colonial international has merely began, however it offers to be as dramatic, as disorienting a metamorphosis as used to be the unique ecu colonial conquest of the human race.
What half does racial distinction play in psychoanalysis? What might be discovered whilst contemplating this question from a postcolonial point of view? during this refined and commanding research, Celia Brickman explores how the colonialist racial discourse of late-nineteenth-century anthropology came across its means into Freud´s paintings, the place it got here to play a covert yet the most important position in his notions of subjectivity.
Additional info for Colonialism 1870–1945: An Introduction
H. Roberts, History London 1925), Vol I, p. 113. 0/ French Colonial Policy; /870-/925 (2 vols 10. 'French Poliey in Afriea between the Wars' in France and Britain in Africa , ed. G . R. Louis (New Haven Conn. 1971), pp. 568-9 . 11. The Economics of Colonialism 1, The issues It has long been con ventional to believe that colon ialism was primarilya device by which the rich imperial states could exploit their dependcncies and, consequentially, that the effect of colonialism was to perpetuate, or even to create, poverty in the colonies.
They therefore justified aIien rule on the ground that colonialism was a neeessary instrument of 'modernization' whieh would he1p other peoples to do what they eould not have done , or have done COLONIALISM 1870 -1945 43 as weIl, by themselves . In so far as these objectives were pursued honestly they perhaps entitled the colonialists to rest with a good conscience . Yet good intentions are not sufficient. On the imperial side the main defect of colonialism was that the administrators on the spot lacked both the tools and the qualifications to carry through their stated programmes.
Yet good intentions are not sufficient. On the imperial side the main defect of colonialism was that the administrators on the spot lacked both the tools and the qualifications to carry through their stated programmes. All modern colonies were starved of resources. No colony paid a money tribute to its parent state, but all were extremely poor because the tax-base in a less-developed country is very limited. Conversely metropolitan states, such as Britain, could not possibly have afforded the cost of large-scale permanent subsidies to so many dependencies, though grants in aid were common for limited periods and from 1929additional funds were available under the Colonial Development Act.
Colonialism 1870–1945: An Introduction by D. K. Fieldhouse