By Joe Karaganis, Lennart Renkema
"Copy tradition within the US and Germany" publishes a survey-based examine designed to convey public opinion to undergo on very important coverage dialog in regards to the way forward for the web. The learn explores what americans and Germans do with electronic media, what they need to do, and the way they reconcile their attitudes and values with diverse regulations and recommendations to implement copyright on-line.
Read or Download Copy culture in the US & Germany PDF
Best public affairs & policy books
This e-book examines the real factor of Turkey's dating with Europe. The authors uniquely current the Turkish view of integration in the extensive context of the debates on Europeanisation and sovereignty, yet with a particular specialize in the interior debates and matters in Turkey itself. Key concerns thought of comprise populism, monetary coverage layout, nationalism, Islam, human rights, company, public attitudes to Europeanisation and the placement of the Turkish polity.
E-book through Brandeis, Louis D.
During this evidence-based and heavily argued paintings, Kathy MacDermott plots the alterations within the tradition of the Australian Public provider that experience led many modern commentators to lament the purported lack of conventional public provider values of impartiality, highbrow rigour and — most significantly — the willingness of public servants in any respect degrees to provide frank and fearless suggestion to their superiors and their ministers.
Additional resources for Copy culture in the US & Germany
54 COPY CULTURE IN THE US AND GERMANY Germans are slightly less likely than Americans to believe that their Internet use is monitored by government or private companies. Yet they are more than twice as likely to take measures to protect their online privacy: 41% make special efforts to encrypt their Internet traffic, and 11% use tools to hide their IP addresses online (such as TOR or a VPN). That is more than twice the percentage of Americans who encrypt traffic (19%) or hide their IP addresses (5%).
Among other provisions, the DEA created a framework for “graduated response” in cases of repeat infringement, leading to disconnection from the Internet. Among Wiggin’s respondents, strong penalties for repeat offenders attracted minimal support: bandwidth throttling, 7%; suspended Internet access, 11%; criminal prosecutions and fines, 14%. ” Fourteen percent agreed with the statement; 60% disagreed. • Germany, 2012: GfK asked about penalties for the narrower act of “making available” infringing content online—a term most likely equated with uploading.
Germans have clear views about what constitutes due process in copyright infringement cases. Sixty-seven percent indicated that the courts are the proper authority in determining the truth of charges of infringement. American views are somewhat softer. Fifty-four percent say that a court should make the determination of whether a person has committed copyright infringement. Only 18% percent say the music companies or movie studios should make that decision; 15% percent propose that ISPs play that role.
Copy culture in the US & Germany by Joe Karaganis, Lennart Renkema